Why do governments want to control artificial intelligence?
The official reasons given for controlling AI are threats to human wellbeing. The real reason may be simpler.
Imagine asking an artificial intelligence engine this academic question: “Do autocracies contain the seeds of their own destruction?“
Well, why imagine when anyone can get a response from ChatGPT in seconds? The following, italicised text is ChatGPT’s answer.
“Yes, many argue that autocracies contain the seeds of their own destruction. There are several factors that contribute to this viewpoint:
- “Lack of Adaptability: Autocratic systems tend to be less adaptable and responsive to changing circumstances compared to more flexible and pluralistic systems. They often struggle to address complex challenges and evolving societal needs, which can lead to discontent and instability.
- “Concentration of Power: Autocracies are characterized by the concentration of power in the hands of a single ruler or a small group of individuals. This concentration of power can lead to corruption, nepotism, and the suppression of dissent. Over time, these factors erode the legitimacy of the regime and undermine social cohesion.
- “Absence of Institutionalized Succession: In autocratic systems, leadership transitions often lack transparent and institutionalized procedures. This can result in power struggles, uncertainty, and potential destabilization. Succession crises can lead to factionalism, internal conflicts, or even violent confrontations, weakening the autocratic regime.
- “Economic Challenges: While some autocracies have achieved economic growth, there is a risk that economic development becomes concentrated in the hands of a select few. This can exacerbate inequalities and lead to social unrest, especially if economic benefits do not reach the broader population.
- “External Pressures: Autocratic regimes face external pressures, such as demands for democracy, human rights, and accountability from the international community. These pressures can limit their ability to maintain control and can contribute to their eventual downfall.
“It is important to note that while autocracies may contain these seeds of self-destruction, the actual outcome depends on specific circumstances, the resilience of the regime, and external factors. Some autocracies have managed to adapt, suppress dissent effectively, or maintain power for extended periods.“
To any reasonable person, this is mild; but perhaps less so to someone who bans Winnie the Pooh because of a supposed resemblance to their own physiognomy…